U.S. survival depends on a renewed national story, Woodard argues in a new essay for AEI’s Social Breakdown series
A rebooted, 21st century version of our civic national narrative is the vital glue that can hold the republic and federation together, Woodard argues in a piece for the American Enterprise Institute’s Center on Opportunity and Social Mobility
In a new essay published in the American Enterprise Institute’s The Social Breakdown series, Nationhood Lab director Colin Woodard argues that the United States is unlikely to survive if a supermajority of Americans can’t find broad agreement on the very big picture questions: For what purpose does our shared federation exist? What does it mean to be an American and who can be one? Where did our country come from and where are we trying to go to together?
In short, Woodard writes, we need a renewed, 21st century national narrative for the United States and based not on imagined bloodlines, the beliefs of any single religious denomination, or shared historical origins (because the American regions and colonies did not share such), but rather on a shared set of ideals found in the Declaration of Independence. And this civic nationalism must triumph over the resurgent ethnonational forces rallied to battle by former president Donald Trump.
“American civic nationalism has had its failings – arrogance, messianic hubris, a self-regard so bright as to blind one to shortcomings – but at its core are unifying, inspirational, and genuinely good ideals that a supermajority of Americans can get behind, be they conservatives or liberals, Republicans or Democrats, or something in between,” Woodard writes in the piece, the latest article in the AEI series hosted by its new Center on Opportunity and Social Mobility, which focuses on issues related to social capital.
The United States was a state before it came up with an argument for also being a nation a fact that has always made it vulnerable to dissolution. An accidental alliance of stateless nations — the regional cultures described in Woodard’s 2011 book American Nations — it had to invent a national story to paper over the massive (and enduring) differences between its component sections (a story told in a sequel, Union.)